Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jason Jung vs Li Tu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jung vs Tu analysis and find out who is favored!
Jason Jung vs Li Tu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jung 1 - 0 Tu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jung has won 55.2% of points on their second serve, while Tu has won 52.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jung, in recent form, has won 52.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tu has won 52.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.71% and 30.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jung has saved 72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tu has saved 65.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jung has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 20/ 15), with Tu winning 55.56% (W/L 40/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 307/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26). Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 109/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 16/ 10), where as Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.73% of matches (W/L 21/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jung winning 1 times and Tu being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jung winning 2 and Tu winning 0. The last match between Jung and Tu was at the Matsuyama Challenger, 10-11-2022, Second, Hard with Jason Jung getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jung and Tu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jung winning 0 times and Tu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jung winning 0, and Tu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.89 while Tu has played against players with an average rank of 218.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jung has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tu has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jung has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tu has converted 36.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
333
Rank
114
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
205
Rank
186
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
56% (412-327)
Career Total W/L
62% (162-98)
67% (4-2)
YTD W/L
53% (16-14)
$350,585
Career Prize Money
$139,510
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jason Jung vs Li Tu For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jung VS Tu
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jason Jung | Li Tu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:53 | 1:6:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (32/47) | 61% (33/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (25/32) | 55% (18/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 29% (6/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (30/54) | 30% (14/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Jason Jung
Player
Li Tu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jason Jung | Li Tu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (4/2) | 53% (16/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 54% (36/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (64/52) | 52% (343/319) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 58% (14/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 130 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:41 | 1:33:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 330.67 | 232.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (233/358) | 66% (1280/1932) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (168/233) | 71% (905/1280) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (69/125) | 52% (342/652) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (15/40) | 36% (67/185) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (148/383) | 38% (781/2044) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 29% (4/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 90% (9/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 53% (16/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 40% (6/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 88% (17/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 12% (17/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 8% (13/1) |
Jason Jung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Maximus Jones
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jason Jung
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Yunseong Chung
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Li Tu
75%
(
91 of
122)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
15
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Li Tu
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Hamish Stewart
79%
(
61 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Li Tu
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Oliver Crawford
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jung Vs Tu Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jung are available here and Tu photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
